The question isn't mathematical reasoning so much as ability to parse confusing pseudo-mathematical sentences.
Mathematical reasoning is a rigorous form of deduction and proof, it's within the grasp of most people but the way it's taught puts people off. All those symbols and deliberately misleading questions like the example above. People can learn to enjoy puzzles and problem solving if they are taught strategies and experience success.
I get your reasoning Ropata. I turned the fractions into 30ths and now come up with 18/30 - same as 3/5.
The question is actually from the police recruiting test which I have filled in again trying to win their monthly I-pod prize.
http://www.newcops.co.nz/GetStarted/TakeTheTest
This is the only one I got wrong by initially answering one. I said in my head five thirds is to a fifth as 5 is to one. And I still think that's an option.
I can also follow your reasoning Dave.
What's the lesson in this? That the cops see things as black and white when they are not? That there is only one possible culprit when there are several? :-))
The lesson is that thinking logically is no longer valued in schools.
My kids went through college back in the bursary days and were often told that the obvious answer was the right answer and that less obvious - but perfectly correct - answers were "wrong".
Actually I could put up a strong case that the first two alternate answers I gave are superior to 3/5, but I'm sure that you don't want to hear such pedantic didacticism.
If you do these sort of tests often enough you understand what the hell they are talking about, so 3/5 is the only 'correct' answer. Convert the shitty fractions into decimal numbers, it's just scaling a ratio of numbers. Boils down to understanding the rules of the game and a few numerical tricks. I suppose cops need a basic grasp of logic, numeracy, reading comprehension, but it still seems like a trick question.
A few different ways of looking at the problem:
The ratio 5/3 : 1/5 == 25/15 : 3/15 == 1.6667 : 0.2
Scaled up by factor of fifteen ==> 25 : 3 Scaled up by factor of three ==> 5 : 3/5
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
14 comments:
I never liked maths, but I will take a stab at it, my guess is 8.
3/5
i knew I would use that B.Sc. one day!
ropata is correct
Yep, Ropata is.
5 was obtained by multiplying everything by 3.
hence 5/3 becomes 5
and 1/5 becomes 3/5
The question isn't mathematical reasoning so much as ability to parse confusing pseudo-mathematical sentences.
Mathematical reasoning is a rigorous form of deduction and proof, it's within the grasp of most people but the way it's taught puts people off. All those symbols and deliberately misleading questions like the example above. People can learn to enjoy puzzles and problem solving if they are taught strategies and experience success.
3/5 is a possible answer.
So is 3 8/15 (or 53/15).
So is 1/15.
The question doesn't contain enough information to require a unique answer.
Dave Christian
So is -1/5.
I suspect that there are an infinite number of solutions.
Dave Christian
I get your reasoning Ropata. I turned the fractions into 30ths and now come up with 18/30 - same as 3/5.
The question is actually from the police recruiting test which I have filled in again trying to win their monthly I-pod prize.
http://www.newcops.co.nz/GetStarted/TakeTheTest
This is the only one I got wrong by initially answering one. I said in my head five thirds is to a fifth as 5 is to one. And I still think that's an option.
I can also follow your reasoning Dave.
What's the lesson in this? That the cops see things as black and white when they are not? That there is only one possible culprit when there are several? :-))
The lesson is that thinking logically is no longer valued in schools.
My kids went through college back in the bursary days and were often told that the obvious answer was the right answer and that less obvious - but perfectly correct - answers were "wrong".
Actually I could put up a strong case that the first two alternate answers I gave are superior to 3/5, but I'm sure that you don't want to hear such pedantic didacticism.
The answer is 1, isn't it?
Finding 15 as common denominator then the original numbers are 25/15and 5/15 five to one ratio). So, in the second case 5 must be followed by 1.
Except 1/5 is not 5/15 ...
My misatke. The answer would be 2/3 then.
If you do these sort of tests often enough you understand what the hell they are talking about, so 3/5 is the only 'correct' answer. Convert the shitty fractions into decimal numbers, it's just scaling a ratio of numbers. Boils down to understanding the rules of the game and a few numerical tricks. I suppose cops need a basic grasp of logic, numeracy, reading comprehension, but it still seems like a trick question.
A few different ways of looking at the problem:
The ratio 5/3 : 1/5
== 25/15 : 3/15
== 1.6667 : 0.2
Scaled up by factor of fifteen ==> 25 : 3
Scaled up by factor of three ==> 5 : 3/5
"If you do these sort of tests often enough you understand what the hell they are talking about".
Quite. Rote 'learning' is in and thinking is out.
Only when we consign state education to the pages of history books will more than a small minority of people again aquire thinking skills.
Dave Christian
Post a Comment