A cut and paste from Samizdata. Appealed to me.
The progress of social programs and the debt
Dale Amon (Belfast, Northern Ireland/Laramie, Wy) · North American affairs
1960’s: Lets eliminate everything bad. We can go to the moon so why not end poverty!
“Yes, do it.”
1970’s: Well, it doesn’t look so easy. We’ll have to spend more money.
“Well, okay.”
1980’s: It is actually not working. Maybe we should spend some more slightly differently.
“Well, give it a try.”
1990’s. We’ve got so many people depending on this! We have to spend more to keep them afloat.
“Well, I don’t want to look like a terrible person, so okay.”
2000’s: The debt is growing, and the social programs are actually having negative effects, but we have to keep trying! We’re nice people! We have to DO SOMETHING!
“Well, is this really necessary… why not cut back… oh, okay, don’t look at me that way.”
2010’s: The country is in debt and things are awful! We must help those who are least able to help themselves. We have to let the world see what nice people we are!
“Well… no.”
You can’t say that! You EVIL RACIST HOMOPHOBIC ANTI-WOMAN OLD WHITE MALE SUPREMACIST!!!!!”
“Oh, bog off.”
Source
Tuesday, August 15, 2017
Monday, August 14, 2017
Metiria goes but the welfare policy stays
The uproar over Metiria Turei wasn't just personal. People were polarized about her past actions and continuing attitude of stubborn, arrogant, defence but the problem for the Greens was multi-faceted. Not least was the reaction to their welfare policy.
Marama Davidson is now leading the 'poverty' policy but there is no talk about changing it. The Greens are still advocating that it is perfectly acceptable not to name the father of a benefit-dependent child, and that failing a drugs test is also OK.
When the state first began financially aiding deserted women it did so under the strict condition that the father had been pursued through the courts, and he would not or could not pay. He could be jailed.
Anyone who was considered to have caused their own incapacity to work was ineligible for social security assistance.
Some would call those conditions draconian. But they kept a lid on welfare numbers for many decades.
Patently the Greens are not going to form a government alone but one of these ideas might slip through. The first. Match that up with Labour's $3000 baby bonus and it isn't hard to predict what will happen.
Marama Davidson is now leading the 'poverty' policy but there is no talk about changing it. The Greens are still advocating that it is perfectly acceptable not to name the father of a benefit-dependent child, and that failing a drugs test is also OK.
When the state first began financially aiding deserted women it did so under the strict condition that the father had been pursued through the courts, and he would not or could not pay. He could be jailed.
Anyone who was considered to have caused their own incapacity to work was ineligible for social security assistance.
Some would call those conditions draconian. But they kept a lid on welfare numbers for many decades.
Patently the Greens are not going to form a government alone but one of these ideas might slip through. The first. Match that up with Labour's $3000 baby bonus and it isn't hard to predict what will happen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
