(Here I am in my 50s and yesterday was the first time in my life I involuntarily lost a paying job. My sympathies to the full-time staff affected by the demise of the 126 year-old newspaper.)
The following was going to be next week's, now defunct Truth column:
In the middle of next month all major welfare benefits will end.
Hopefully that's got your attention! It's true. The domestic purposes,
invalid, sickness and unemployment benefits will disappear forever.
Don't panic though. They will be replaced by Jobseeker Support, Sole
Parent Support and Supported Living Payment. My initial response to
this re-labelling exercise was weary cynicism. Why is the government
bothering?
The major reason - Work and Income is set to become far more
work-focussed than ever before and recategorising more people onto
Jobseeker Support means more people will have work obligations.
Apparently there will be 132,500 jobseeker beneficiaries, most with
full-time work obligations. These will include women with children aged
14 or older who've come from the DPB. The minority with part-time
obligations will include people who've come from the sickness benefit.
If people suitable for jobs that require drug-free status can't pass a
drug-test, they'll lose half of their benefit. If this happens a second
time, their benefit (and any other assistance) will be suspended. The
government says it's reasonable to expect people on a benefit not to
engage in behaviours that limit their ability to find work.
Under the new system, the only beneficiaries who won't be expected to
look for work are those on the Supported Living Payment, ex invalid
beneficiaries, carers of the sick or infirm; and those on the Sole
Parent Support with a child under 5 (though the last group will have
planning-for-work obligations). Sole parents with children of school age
will need to look for part-time jobs.
There are risks. Cabinet identifies them. One, if the economic revival
falters, jobs won't be created and two, if there are IT glitches (think
Novopay nightmare) public support for welfare reform and the government
will be negatively impacted. For the sake of beneficiaries, and the
prospects of a more productive, wealthier and healthier country, let's
hope neither of these possibilities become realities.