The welfare state is unsustainable economically, socially and morally.
Thursday, May 11, 2006
What a crock
"While we are disappointed our ranking has declined, this has more to do with changes in overall economic conditions, many of which are cyclical, than any genuine deterioration in our competitiveness."
That's Minister of Finance, Michael Cullen weasling his way out of dropping 6 places in the World Competitiveness Yearbook. SIX places.
I still can't believe that 41% of voters voted for Labour and their foolish Finance fellow Michael Cullen. The sheeple seem to not understand the fact that Labour will always try to deceive the public into believing government handouts are affordable and necessary, whilst neglecting the fact that private individuals and companies carry the burden of providing for their needless spending whilst continuing to make it harder for private individuals and businesses to get ahead.
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
7 comments:
Cullen: Let's not forget that New Zealand is still a great place to do business.
Was that a threat?
As is abundantly clear now, our economy is now history.
I still can't believe that 41% of voters voted for Labour and their foolish Finance fellow Michael Cullen. The sheeple seem to not understand the fact that Labour will always try to deceive the public into believing government handouts are affordable and necessary, whilst neglecting the fact that private individuals and companies carry the burden of providing for their needless spending whilst continuing to make it harder for private individuals and businesses to get ahead.
When the economic indicators are good it is a result of Government policies that are responsible.
When they are bad it is external factors that are to blame.
This is an invariable law of economics.
I just wanted to fix my fracured English. sorry
When the economic indicators are good it is a result of Government policies.
When they are bad it is external factors that are to blame.
This is an invariable law of economics
Coge - of course it makes sense for us to pay for the retirement of people who have done nothing to support our economy, what were you thinking?
Hey what a great site keep up the work its excellent.
»
Super color scheme, I like it! Keep up the good work. Thanks for sharing this wonderful site with us.
»
Post a Comment