Trevor Mallard opened at the business breakfast I attended at the Wainuiomata RSA this morning. He made hay with the just-released MSD social report which shows improvement in a number of indicators. Fortunately I followed (there was only Labour, National and ACT present!) and was quickly able to reel off a list of trends which are going in the wrong direction - violent crime, truancy and violence in schools, teenage birthrate, STDs, receipt of sickness and invalid benefits, substance and alcohol abuse. The thrust of my speech covered National morphing into Labour and depriving the electorate of a clear choice, the 20 Point Plan, why special privilege for one business hurts the next, why we wouldn't want, in a month of Sundays, the government running supermarkets and nationalising plumbers yet accept that they run schools and hospitals. Surely food and running water are as important as education and hip operations? It strikes me, as I watch faces, that many people have never thought at this level.
The audience seemed mainly concerned about social problems, crime and political correctness. When asked what we could do about the list of negative trends I described, I was right where I wanted to be and received the first spontaneous round of applause from the audience when talking about the consequences of 'paying babies to have babies'. It's an issue that touches a nerve and one I am deeply concerned about.
Paul Quinn has a limited repertoire and no firm philosophy. But he has the polls (and PM) on his side. At some point the meetings always degenerate into who is telling the truth? Trevor or Paul?
Trevor is very secure in his electorate. He knows the local issues and should, after so many terms. But he concluded by asking them to re-elect him because, indicating the National candidate, "He will be in on the list anyway." Quinn is at 48. Mallard knows the anti-labour vote is so strong he is prepared to ask for just the electorate vote.
I asked for the Party Vote so ACT would have more MPs in parliament giving National direction and spine. More MPs that were prepared to call a spade a spade and not keep sweeping problems under the carpet. More MPs who are not happy with just the status quo. More MPs pushing for real change.
Sowell says
48 minutes ago
6 comments:
I wonder if number 48 will be sufficient for the National chap to enter parliament...I have a sneaking suspicion they will cock the entire election up...(due to no policies to deal with crime or political correctness)
Good work Lindsay. Sounds like a healthy dose of commonsense was needed to be injected into that breakfast!
Hey Lindsay- I see Trevor Mallard got the same list placing as you!
You may have been in with a chance!
;-)
"I have a sneaking suspicion they will cock the entire election up" ..
You've been saying that for some time, Elijah. Short of anything catastrophic happening over the next ten weeks, I still disagree - and the thought gives me no pleasure.
I think the majority of the electorate's loathing for Labour & the Greens *outweighs* their frustration with National's pussyfooting & wetness, etc.
They'll vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than (think to) seek out better ideas.
That's my thought, anyway.
Lindsay, you're right: the 'state-owned supermarkets' analogy is really good. I find it resonates with people, too - perhaps more clearly than anything else.
Philosophy is all well & good in theory - but give people a simple, clear-cut *example* of it and then watch their eyes open.
Mallard should of course be in Mt Crawford not in the Beehive.
There's no question on current polling 48 will be enough to get in on the National list.
But Lindsay is right - to ensure a change of government, you must vote National in the electorate vote and ACT in the party vote
Thanks to MMP, anything else - and that means "two ticks national" is a vote for a nightmare Labour/NZF/Greens party
Post a Comment