This is a bad business. Obviously hospital authorities have only NOW discovered the patient with CJD had a graft from an infected donor in 1984. If they had known, presumably they would not have used any instruments on her that would then be used on other patients. Then again, it is probably naive of me to imagine that there would be a flagged question mark over this particular patient given developments since 1984 for others who received tissue from the same company.
No comments:
Post a Comment