Gordon Campbell is running his usual line about the privatisation of welfare services/benefits lining the pockets of National's ideological mates.
The potential for dehumanizing, intrusive action by private sector agencies in the lives of vulnerable families is quite high. Unemployment, after all, is still rising, and the economy is barely in recovery mode. For many families at risk, the jobs are simply not there – and to use the jargon – ‘the labour market continues to be de-leveraged.’ Cracking down on welfare families at such a time would be punitive, and unjust. Yet, as indicated, this policy is probably less about saving taxpayer money or helping the vulnerable, than it is about creating opportunities to make money from their plight.
Get it? Only the state is genuinely interested in the plight of the needy. Any other party is looking to exploit them.
I have commented ;
Many families were ‘at risk’ when the jobs WERE there. It is entirely obvious that thousands of families have defaulted to welfare before acquiring qualifications or work skills and getting a job pays less than growing the family.
The prospect of separatism does not excite me but it would be interesting to see what the likes of John Tamihere can do given control of benefit payments.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
To say nothing of the 'dehumanising, and intrusive actions' of the State Sector, especially via IRD, to take the money from me so I can support the Harris gang to the lifestyle they think they deserve on my effort.
Great ain't it. The compassionate state: yeah right.
(Great blog this year Lindsay, probably my last read before Christmas, so have a great Christmas, look forward to following you in the New Year.)
Post a Comment