Jacqui Dean's bid to have party pills banned looks more and more ridiculous. You know something has to be off the scale when Sue Kedgeley can recognise 'inconsistency'.
Now we have the danger of toddlers taking party pills introduced into the argument. Anybody with an ounce of nous knows some toddlers will put anything resembling a sweet or a sweet drink in their mouths. And they do. What is particularly unique about party pills?
There have been no deaths of children (or adults for that matter) due to ingestion of BZP.
There have been deaths of children who have taken their parent's take-home methadone - not here but in Scotland. Ban methadone. That's the answer.
Oh look. Better ban vitamin tablets while we are at it; The amount of iron contained in children's and adult vitamins can be enough to kill a child when taken in excessive amounts. In 1997, the FDA implemented rules that require unit-dose packaging for iron-containing products with 30 milligrams or more of iron per dosage unit. For a small child, as little as 600 milligrams of iron can be fatal.
Then we should move on to anti-depressants and anti-hypertensive medications; Tofranil [imipramine], an antidepressant drug also used for childhood bedwetting, and Catapres [clonidine], a high blood pressure medicine, can be very hazardous because it takes very little to produce life-threatening problems in children. One tablet may do it.
Next ban turps, lighter fluid, bleach....Children have died after swallowing such everyday substances as charcoal, lighter fluid, paint thinner and remover, antifreeze, turpentine and pesticides.
I need not go on.
The only ban that would really make a difference is a ban on stupidity.
RANZ Update
2 hours ago
4 comments:
This is the same woman who asked to ban DHMO/Water remember.
There is still time to get your submission in, even if it is as simple as "I do not support this bill".
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/SC/SubmCalled/8/c/b/48SCHEmisusedrugsbzp200710121-Misuse-of-Drugs-Classification-of-BZP.htm
I remember alright. I hesitated before calling her a foolish woman. Perhaps a woman with foolish ideas. But why split hairs? What are we if not the sum of our thoughts and ideas.
A foolish woman in this case, but could well be the case of any number of MPs who want to tell me how to live my life.
Small despots in search of a meaningless cause. To all of them: bugger off!
With a little guidance from you, Lindsay, perhaps her contribution in Parliament could become more meaningful.
Well wouldn't it?
She has an effective delivery style of speaking, she just needs to be "on message".
Post a Comment