data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84810/84810c0feceea4551f183b82c649e4d6a55ee8e7" alt=""
The Commission, in the first government inquiry into the huge increase in male joblessness, found that 9 percent of men aged 25 to 44 are not even looking for work - up from 2 percent in the seventies.
How does New Zealand compare?
Comparative figures at June 2005;
NZ Sickness and Invalid benefits 118,362
Male 55%
Female 45%
Australia Disability pension 706,800
Male 59%
Female 41%
NZ Unemployment benefit 50,714
Male 65%
Female 35%
Australia Newstart 453,700
Male 66%
Female 34%
New Zealand has a slightly lower percentage of people aged 15-64 at 66.1 percent compared to Australia's 67.3 percent but, for the purpose of comparison, roughly speaking the Australian caseloads should be 5 times more than NZ's. In fact their incapacity benefits are 6 times greater and unemployment, 9 times greater.
I suppose we should be celebrating our better performance. Does it make up for the cricket?
No comments:
Post a Comment