Saturday, September 26, 2020

Blinkers where they shouldn't be

An article discussing the 'right to silence' laws on the back of another clamour to have it removed in the case of child abuse deaths quotes  "law expert and recent Parole Board appointee Khylee Quince".

Abolishing the right to silence would also have “huge gender implications”, she says.

“No one abuses children without abusing mothers. It could make things worse for people ... in relationships of violence and coercive control where their whole lives are really framed around managing violence of a male partner or a male member of the household.”

In many instances, those women, or extended family, will have sought help previously or tried to raise red flags, and failed.

I wonder if she sits on any women's prison parole boards? Perhaps not.

Since first data was collected in 1967 women have been killing children too.




Granted mothers are more likely to kill their babies shortly after birth or in a murder/suicide situation but they are not exempt from killing them through abuse or neglect. Note also the relatively high number of non-mother female caregivers responsible for CAN deaths.

The telling number though is the one related to step-fathers. And deaths are just the tip of the abuse iceberg.

Of course, the use of the term 'step-father' here is quite a departure. Step-fathers used to describe men that married and took on their new wife's children, usually after she was widowed. More recently, after divorce. That's a committment.

Today 'step-fathers' are just as  likely to be shiftless, ill-motivated, individuals looking for regular sex and somewhere to park themselves rent-free. 



 

1 comment:

Oi said...

I served for nearly 25 years and ran into the right to silence innumerable times. There are, in fact, extremely limited occasions when that right does not exist here - but even so, I would be most reluctant to dispense with it, as it is one of the cornerstones of our justice system which has done service for hundreds of years.
Some would say it will be OK, we would only apply it to child abuse, but how many times have we seen that this would only be the thin end of the wedge - just like our social welfare system which commenced as a short term helping hand, and is STILL expanding as we speak!

I note with approbation, that the Police have arrested a family member in this latest case of child death and obstinate silence, and such a result is usual.

I see no burning requirement for change.