An article discussing the 'right to silence' laws on the back of another clamour to have it removed in the case of child abuse deaths quotes "law expert and recent Parole Board appointee Khylee Quince".
Abolishing the right to silence would also have “huge gender implications”, she says.
“No one abuses children without abusing mothers. It could make things worse for people ... in relationships of violence and coercive control where their whole lives are really framed around managing violence of a male partner or a male member of the household.”
In many instances, those women, or extended family, will have sought help previously or tried to raise red flags, and failed.
I wonder if she sits on any women's prison parole boards? Perhaps not.
Since first data was collected in 1967 women have been killing children too.
1 comment:
I served for nearly 25 years and ran into the right to silence innumerable times. There are, in fact, extremely limited occasions when that right does not exist here - but even so, I would be most reluctant to dispense with it, as it is one of the cornerstones of our justice system which has done service for hundreds of years.
Some would say it will be OK, we would only apply it to child abuse, but how many times have we seen that this would only be the thin end of the wedge - just like our social welfare system which commenced as a short term helping hand, and is STILL expanding as we speak!
I note with approbation, that the Police have arrested a family member in this latest case of child death and obstinate silence, and such a result is usual.
I see no burning requirement for change.
Post a Comment