Assuming Treasury deals in accurate statistics here are some about the minimum wage:
"The minimum wage has grown much
faster than average wages over the last decade...
In 2011 our minimum wage was 60% of the median
earnings for full-time workers. This was amongst the highest ratios in the OECD,
and well above the level found in most countries which is typically around 45%.
For
instance, the ratio was 45% in Australia, 38% in the United Kingdom, 40% in
Canada, and 28% in the United States.[1]
Increasing the rate still higher to 88% of the median wage would take the
minimum wage well outside the normal range. This is likely to make employment
for people with low skills difficult in an internationally focused economy.
... the minimum wage applies to a smaller
proportion of the workforce (less than 4%) ...
63 percent of households earning below $18.40 are
single adults without dependants.
The current objective of the
minimum wage is to protect the real incomes of low wage earners, while
minimising job losses. It is not an effective mechanism for reducing poverty on
its own, nor is it intended to be. Instead, there are other measures, like
income transfers, subsidised access to health and education services, and
childcare assistance, to improve the wellbeing of families with low incomes.
Raising the floor on wages will... always
provide greatest benefit to younger people, and especially to those in the
teens and early 20s."
1 comment:
All the more reason for ACT to have picked Jamie Whyte - a philosopher & economist who can speak with authority about how NZ's minimum wage laws are far too high (and indeed how all employment laws should be repealed0
Post a Comment