I returned to the study cited this morning to see how that percentage compared to 1994-5. Information held in the CYF computer was compared to that held in the Social Welfare system. A 'match' indicated the subject of the care and protection order had a caregiver with a Social Welfare Number (SWN).
Table 1 Matched Cases Between SWIFT and SWis Systems
Match/No
Match
|
Number
|
Per cent
|
Number
|
Per cent
|
Match,
with SWN
|
236
|
79
|
256
|
85
|
Match,
but no SWN
|
10
|
3
|
7
|
2
|
No
Match
|
54
|
18
|
37
|
12
|
TOTAL
|
300
|
100
|
300
|
99*
|
So 82 percent of the Care and protection cases involved a caregiver (usually mother) who had a SWN.
However, "In a substantial minority of these matches, 107 cases (36%) in the care and protection sample and 80 cases (27%) in the youth justice sample, no current income-tested benefit was being paid nor was there a benefit paid over the 1994-95 period."
This would drop the percentage significantly.
So I'm still keen to know what the source is for the Professor's claim. Some questions I think.
UPDATE. I have been in touch with the Professor who has very quickly responded and provided a link to their study. Here is the exact wording: "Of all children having a finding of maltreatment by age 5, 83% are seen on a benefit before age 2, translating into a
very high “capture” rate."
3 comments:
To be fair, having a SWN does not mean you are currently on a benefit. I have a SWN and have not had any involvement with the benefit system since 1990.
Yes, and I pointed that out below the table. I probably had one in the 90s too after a fortnight on the dole.
How dare you go on the dole Lindsay.
Post a Comment