Looks like working age benefits are still pretty much what they were in 2000, but there's been significant growth in student loans and superannuation - both of which the PM has refused to touch as it might make him somewhat less popular. Nothing like strong leadership in troubled times, eh?
Regarding working age benefits, yes the total number is similar. But the make-up is worse. Greater percentages of the whole are on DPB and IB. Duration of stay on those benefits is much higher so the degree of dependency is greater.
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
3 comments:
Looks like working age benefits are still pretty much what they were in 2000, but there's been significant growth in student loans and superannuation - both of which the PM has refused to touch as it might make him somewhat less popular. Nothing like strong leadership in troubled times, eh?
I agree PM. Key has been weak in those areas.
Regarding working age benefits, yes the total number is similar. But the make-up is worse. Greater percentages of the whole are on DPB and IB. Duration of stay on those benefits is much higher so the degree of dependency is greater.
If a greater percentage is on the DPB, the increase in CYF notifications also becomes unsurprising.
Post a Comment