Here's a judge asking a rhetorical question I think;
"Is it a case of the more kids she has at home the lighter the court should be on her?"
I can think of a few others.
"Is it a case of the more kids she has at home the more income she receives?"
"Is it a case of the more kids she has at home the longer she can avoid getting a job?"
"Is it a case of the more kids she has at home the more men she can do a dodgy child support deal with?"
Don't you just love paying taxes to fund this fiasco? It really is a privilege to live in a country where the welfare system ensures everyone can belong and participate. And then some.
About time
59 minutes ago
4 comments:
Is it a case of the more kids she has at home the greater the childcare bill in the school holidays if she works?
To people with kids - they are your kids you had them, no-one forced you to have them, pay for them yourselves. I do not owe you for having kids.
Anon - I agree. I have enough problems paying the scot for my two kids. People get up in arms about battery chickens and breeding farms but have no problem with young women pumping out future welfare cases.
Battery chicks, LOL Brian.
Moi wonders how many roosters have crowed over this chicks roost?
Dirk
Post a Comment