By the time you look to the actual income sources for most liable partners (welfare), take into account those who have escaped overseas, and realize that those actually paying are paying into general funds and not to support directly, the answer is just about zero.
90 per cent. This is why the govt keeps having to think up new taxes, they won't draw back the cancerous welfare state, and the taxpayer is stuck with it.
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
9 comments:
May I guess between 30 and 40%?
25%?
JC
5%?
By the time you look to the actual income sources for most liable partners (welfare), take into account those who have escaped overseas, and realize that those actually paying are paying into general funds and not to support directly, the answer is just about zero.
10% ???
Not sure I understand the question. Can you elaborate?
90 per cent. This is why the govt keeps having to think up new taxes, they won't draw back the cancerous welfare state, and the taxpayer is stuck with it.
Fuck all
Oswald gets the chocolate fish.
Last anon is partly right but it doesn't apply to all liable parents. Some pay plenty.
Post a Comment