The welfare state is unsustainable economically, socially and morally.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Katherine Rich announces departure
That will lower the collective IQ of the National Party a few points. All the best Katherine. I am sure you have made the right decision.
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I always thought Rich should have been in the Labour Party: she was a welfare statist.
Although despite her resignation, the National front line still has the same problem, which is not so much lack of feminine representation, (so long as a political party is about ideas, philosophy, does that really matter?) so much as too many socialists and no classical liberals, starting at the very top.
This is quite a clever post. People can take from it whatever they wish. At face value it seems empathetic. And that she was well above average IQ. But actually it says she has a very low IQ, a loss of few points from the total of the caucus. The right decision to leave is a good thing for politics.
I guess it is going to be easier to answer the classic Blackadder question from now on, slightly adapted: Who is using the party brain cell at the moment?
I never thought highly of K. Rich. My opinion has been confirmed now that I've heard Chris Carter on the radio praising her and lamenting Rich's departure.
You cannot be that effective if your political enemies speak well of you.
This election year requires total dedication in the effort to defeat Labour. Nothing less will do.
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
4 comments:
I always thought Rich should have been in the Labour Party: she was a welfare statist.
Although despite her resignation, the National front line still has the same problem, which is not so much lack of feminine representation, (so long as a political party is about ideas, philosophy, does that really matter?) so much as too many socialists and no classical liberals, starting at the very top.
Mark Hubbard
This is quite a clever post. People can take from it whatever they wish.
At face value it seems empathetic. And that she was well above average IQ.
But actually it says she has a very low IQ, a loss of few points from the total of the caucus.
The right decision to leave is a good thing for politics.
I guess it is going to be easier to answer the classic Blackadder question from now on, slightly adapted:
Who is using the party brain cell at the moment?
I never thought highly of K. Rich. My opinion has been confirmed now that I've heard Chris Carter on the radio praising her and lamenting Rich's departure.
You cannot be that effective if your political enemies speak well of you.
This election year requires total dedication in the effort to defeat Labour. Nothing less will do.
Post a Comment