The RNZ beat-up of Oranga Tamariki continues.
The article opens with:
There have been 40 instances where Oranga Tamariki staff have physically harmed children in their care in the last two-and-a-half years....
Then further in:
In the latest biannual report, for the six months to December 2020, there were 13 findings of physical harm against children where staff were responsible.
So how do these numbers stack up?
Only at the very end of the coverage do we learn:
The Safety of Children in Care reports showed that Oranga Tamariki staff were not the only people abusing children in care.All up, in the six months to December 2020, there were almost 300 instances of neglect, or emotional, sexual or physical abuse, affecting more than 200 children.
Here is the OT report referenced.
There were 13 findings of physical harm by staff alleged to have caused the harm. 8 children had 8 findings of physical harm within a residential placement. Some allegations against staff happened outside of residential placement and "for a small number of incidents, it was not possible to determine where the incident took place or who caused it." (Hence the variability of numbers)
But lets move on to the bigger picture. The first graph is PHYSICAL harm:
The children at highest risk of being harmed are those in the return/remain home placement. Least likely are those in a family placement.
Children with findings of harm living in residential placements (4%) was representative of the overall numbers of children in this placement type (4%).
Given the nature of these troubled children and youth, the instances of harm caused by staff do not seem remarkable.
3 comments:
Shame no need to refer to the number of OT workers physically harmed by the "Children" in their care, apparently.
Something entirely relevant in any discussion of a "partial" recording of an incident.
Recall the sad events when staff were forced to merely look on while an inmate was killed because there were not sufficient staff available to intervene.
I have a bloody good bugger mate who would have died at Paparoa Men's prison had the Broom handle of the weapon of choice by an inmate not broken allowing a pause that saved his life. A life that has severe restrictions due to the damage that had occurred by then.
These are not the little darlings normally associated with the generic term Child, alas.
Quite Gravedodger. Many are on their way to prison. And have been since birth.
Lindsay, when employed in her professional capacity dealing with families at risk, my wife had occasion to visit a client and was met at the gate by a 3year old. The "child," told the lady with the smile to "FUCK OFF" while the miscreants Mum and dad stood on the front step laughing.
Post a Comment