Mark, There was a time when a man would marry his brother's widow to provide for her and her children. It was a common practice during times of war and illness. But those quaint ideas of families supporting one anther have long gone by the by. We've gone from one extreme - the application of the Destitute Persons Act whereby an individual could be held legally bound for the support of a cousin - to the other, whereby a biological father needn't be pursued for child support nor named on the birth certificate.
Lindsay, I don't have a brother and to be honest, my late sisters husband never got my motor running. He couldn't cook and didn't like chopping firewood, thought such things beneath a man. One of us wouldn't have survived the experience. Like I've said in the past "givers got to set limits, because takers never do." But seriously, dont you think the news report, if it could be called that, was woefully lacking in substance? I got the feeling the system was being held responsible, but perhaps the finger of blame could have been pointed in other directions.
Most news reports of this ilk - a self-reported victim up against 'the system' - suffer from a dearth of detail. To ask for more might infringe on privacy rights and, heaven-forbid, introduce some much-needed nuance into how the reader perceives the situation.
I suggest going public with ones grievances is a bit like entering hospital where I was told if I was in for more than a day "I should leave my dignity at the door."
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
6 comments:
I also commented on that.
Why does he bear no responsibility for the grown-up daughter? Is it not his child?
An explanation would have gone a long way - but journalists don't seem to ask those questions.
Lindsay, perhaps Barney is the husband of the mother but not the father of the daughter?
News story aside, I wonder what the true story is?
Mark, There was a time when a man would marry his brother's widow to provide for her and her children. It was a common practice during times of war and illness. But those quaint ideas of families supporting one anther have long gone by the by. We've gone from one extreme - the application of the Destitute Persons Act whereby an individual could be held legally bound for the support of a cousin - to the other, whereby a biological father needn't be pursued for child support nor named on the birth certificate.
Lindsay, I don't have a brother and to be honest, my late sisters husband never got my motor running. He couldn't cook and didn't like chopping firewood, thought such things beneath a man. One of us wouldn't have survived the experience. Like I've said in the past "givers got to set limits, because takers never do."
But seriously, dont you think the news report, if it could be called that, was woefully lacking in substance?
I got the feeling the system was being held responsible, but perhaps the finger of blame could have been pointed in other directions.
Most news reports of this ilk - a self-reported victim up against 'the system' - suffer from a dearth of detail. To ask for more might infringe on privacy rights and, heaven-forbid, introduce some much-needed nuance into how the reader perceives the situation.
I suggest going public with ones grievances is a bit like entering hospital where I was told if I was in for more than a day "I should leave my dignity at the door."
Post a Comment