It appears there are plans to make the tests 'fairer' but the reasoning seems dubious.The writer concludes:
Family wealth allows parents to locate in neighborhoods with better schools (or spring for private schools). Parents who are themselves college educated tend to make more money, and since today’s high school seniors were born in the mid-1990s, many of the wealthiest and best-educated parents themselves came of age when the tests were of crucial importance. When the SAT is crucial to college, college is crucial to income, and income is crucial to SAT scores, a mutually reinforcing cycle develops.And a similar pattern is replicated here. I extracted the following from the latest NZ Income Survey.
It shows the personal weekly income by estimated number in eligible population (000). Generally, the higher the educational qualification, the higher the personal income.
Highest qualification(7) | $1,190 & over | Under $210 |
No qualification | 55.7 | 178.8 |
Lower secondary school qualification | 40.2 | 83.1 |
Upper secondary school qualification | 61.9 | 204.9 |
School qualification not specified | S | 3.1 |
Level 1-3 certificate post-school | 10.4 | 18.1 |
Level 4-7 certificate or diploma | 184.9 | 79.7 |
Bachelor's degree (incl Honours) | 191.2 | 73.8 |
Postgraduate qualification | 117.6 | 25.8 |
Other post-school | 33.0 | 28.3 |
Post-school not specified | 6.3 | 5.2 |
Total(5) | 706.6 | 706.7 |
(The seemingly anomalous figure in the second column is probably influenced by working-age females not in the workforce eg stay-at-home mums. Data comprises all individuals aged 15 and over)
1 comment:
If only we could mandate attitudes of parents and children's peers at school this wouldn't be a problem that is impossible to 'fix'. I truly don't understand why anyone would think this is a useful way to present information other than misleading people into a false prejudice.
Post a Comment