Silly old John Key, of course, is sticking with his bloodyminded refusal to raise the age of eligibility for super. In spite of my voting for the Nats last time, if Labour win the next election it will serve Key right for his foolishness with this policy.
There are *still* easy savings to be made -
* Raising the super eligibility age.
* Axing WFF and the DPB. Treat DPBers the same as the unemployed, no matter how many children they have. Make *them* shoulder the cost of having children - not the taxpayer.
I'm now convinced that the so-called "welfare reforms" are not worthy of the name. They are mere window-dressing compared to what else could (and should) be done. Shame on Key and the Nats for wimping out.
Comments are not moderated but will be deleted if they are abusive. Non-deletion of comments does not imply approval or agreement with the sentiments expressed.
Lindsay Mitchell has been researching and commenting on welfare since 2001. Many of her articles have been published in mainstream media and she has appeared on radio,tv and before select committees discussing issues relating to welfare. Lindsay is also an artist who works under commission and exhibits at Wellington, New Zealand, galleries.
1 comment:
Interesting (and pretty scary) graphs.
Silly old John Key, of course, is sticking with his bloodyminded refusal to raise the age of eligibility for super. In spite of my voting for the Nats last time, if Labour win the next election it will serve Key right for his foolishness with this policy.
There are *still* easy savings to be made -
* Raising the super eligibility age.
* Axing WFF and the DPB. Treat DPBers the same as the unemployed, no matter how many children they have. Make *them* shoulder the cost of having children - not the taxpayer.
I'm now convinced that the so-called "welfare reforms" are not worthy of the name. They are mere window-dressing compared to what else could (and should) be done.
Shame on Key and the Nats for wimping out.
Post a Comment