Monday, September 13, 2010

Kiro calls for higher benefits for Maori

From Simon Collin's article it becomes apparent that what Cindy Kiro said last week was misreported by Catherine Delahunty. She isn't looking at what employment opportunities await young Maori but asking for more early investment and higher benefits.

Former Children's Commissioner Cindy Kiro has made an impassioned plea to invest more in Maori children - for the sake of New Zealand's economy.

She told a conference on welfare reform that Maori were "the canary in the coalmine", losing their jobs and being thrown on to welfare benefits before others when the economy was hit by recession.


It actually matters not whether the country is in recession. Throughout the 'good' times Maori continued to be heavily over represented on benefits.

Dr Kiro, now an associate professor at Massey University's School of Public Health, said these differences were driven by a wider increase in inequality in New Zealand since the late 1980s.

"Maori and Pacific families and individuals are among the most deprived and this is part of the macroeconomic environment that we need to address," she said.


A challenge for Dr Kiro. How does she explain the sharp difference between Maori welfare dependency and Pacific? At June 2010 of all those receiving a benefit 32.1 percent were Maori whereas only 8.3 percent were Pacific.


Professor Kiro said the ageing non-Maori population, combined with relatively high Maori and Pacific birth rates, meant the future NZ economy would depend on today's Maori and Pacific children.

"Quite apart from the moral imperative, we have an undeniable self-interest in making sure they grow up well-educated and well-adjusted. They must, to look after us oldies when it comes time.

"The scientific evidence about the importance of the early years in terms of good life outcomes, including productivity, is now overwhelming."

If Maori children were growing up in families on welfare, then welfare payments had to be high enough to support good lives in decent housing.


Defeated. Forget that children do better when their income comes from the market. Forget that they need a working parent to build expectations. Forget that they need in situ fathers to protect from going off the rails and being prey to gang recruitment.

Put welfare payments up and all we will have is more relatively poor parents and children on benefits. Especially Maori. Kiro has a very poor understanding of what really matters regardless of ethnicity. People need work and strong, constructive relationships, both of which are undermined by the DPB in particular.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I doubt many Maori doctors, nurses, teachers, etc are unemployed. It's not the colour of the skin, it's not the family background. It's the person applying for the job that either gets employed, or not.

Even without tertiary education, if you are nicely presented, speak well, have a good attitude and are willing to give a fair day's work for a fair day's pay, you will get a job.

Linda

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

All she really needs to do is advocate for the abolition of youth rates.

James said...

"Even without tertiary education, if you are nicely presented, speak well, have a good attitude and are willing to give a fair day's work for a fair day's pay, you will get a job.

Linda

I hope so! Thats what Im trying to do from today...;-)

James said...

All she really needs to do is advocate for the abolition of youth rates."

Not till Im secure in a job she doesn't.No youh rates means old fogies like me with experiance are more attractive to employers so Im milking that big time...;-0

Anonymous said...

Too much is weighted upon Tertiary qualifications, it's all about the piece of paper and not about common sense and good work ethics. Why doesn't National change the system?