According to the NZ Herald;
It is understood the group will tomorrow recommend solo parents get work from when the child is three years old, One News reported.
This will cause an unholy outcry.
But the recommendation is not radical by international standards.
The following table is now out-of-date but I can tell you that the trend is lowering the age of youngest child. Not lifting it. The UK and Australia have moved to 6 as has NZ. The US and Canada have a range of ages according to the state or province, with the US maximum of 1 year. Norway, France, Germany and Switzerland were work-testing at 3 when this table was published.
The Herald's Simon Collins has found a trier who can't get work, or much of it.
But this individual is not what the reforms are about. The reforms are aimed at reducing the sort of long term dependence that persists throughout periods of low unemployment. That's why the focus is on the DPB, the sickness and invalid's benefits.
Also some media commentators yesterday started talking up "benefit cuts". That is scaremongering and unnecessarily worrying those on benefits. The level of payments was outside of the scope of this report. Key has confirmed there will not be cuts.
Hayek on the accidental nature of progress
25 minutes ago