From question time today;
Judith Collins: Why is it that in the period of so-called record low unemployment, almost 130,000 people—5 percent of the *working-age population—are too sick to work, which is a 50 percent increase since 1999 and is yet another record high?
Hon RUTH DYSON: It would pay the member to be a little more robust with the accuracy of her figures. In fact, the number of people of working age on a *sickness benefit is 1.5 percent of the total population, and the number of people of working age on an *invalids benefit—
Madam SPEAKER: It is difficult to hear.
Hon RUTH DYSON: —is 2.5 percent, which is a total of only 3.9 percent.
Rt Hon Winston Peters: I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. We could not hear any part of that answer whatsoever.
Madam SPEAKER: I thank the member. I will ask the Minister to repeat her answer.
Hon RUTH DYSON: My answer advised the member who asked the supplementary question to be a little more robust in the accuracy of the information she provides in those questions. The number of people of working age on a sickness benefit is 1.5 percent of the total working-age population, and on an invalids benefit it is 2.4 percent.
The September benefit factsheets clearly show that 3% of working age people are on an Invalid Benefit and (almost) 1.9% are on a Sickness Benefit. That adds up to 4.9%
If you think I am quibbling 1% of the working age population, using MSD definition of 18-64 years of age, is around 25,000 people.
Good start Ruth.
The difference is that 4.9 is 25% more than 3.9.
ReplyDeleteJust as 12.5% GST is 25% more tax than 10% GST.
Isn't if funny that their precious "sustainability" never gets a mention when debating these figures?
ReplyDeleteThe difference is explained in full here at Dyson gets good advice
ReplyDelete