Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Let's have gender before merit

If there is one thing I can't stand it's gender politics. National has a new champion of the cause, Jackie Blue. Here she is demanding an answer:

While my heartfelt congratulations goes to all those New Zealanders who received a New Year Honour, I’m personally disappointed that women were under represented says, National's Women's Affairs spokeswoman, Dr Jackie Blue.

"While women make up just over half of the population, a little over one third of the awards went to them. We need to know why this is the case."

Because, whoever compiles the list didn't sit down with a quota saying, give her an award over him for no other reason than we need to dish them out 50/50.

Perhaps this is how National plans to attract women voters from the left.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:33 PM

    Or could it be that fewer women have a wife to manage the Economic Family Unit while they pursue greater successes in the public sphere?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right. Women are tied to the kitchen sink by their apron strings. I have stretchy ones so I can reach the computer.

    Perhaps we could have Honours for Housework to redress the balance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:44 PM

    Is there something intrinsically laughable about Honours for Housework, or for example, child-rearing? Sorry, I missed it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you have a child you owe it to that child to rear it well. You don't have to be put on a pedestal for it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:32 PM

    Perhaps it is desirable for any person to excel in her or his primary sphere of activity? If this is the case, then why should excellence in care-work performed for others be any less valuable than supposed excellence in, for example, being a billion-dollar Hollywood film director?
    However, my original point was that women still perform the great majority of care-work, and the incessant nature of this work surely makes it harder for them to attain great success in other fields.
    I remember Helen Clark, who is certainly no heroine of mine, saying some time ago that she would never be where she is if she was not childless.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:39 AM

    or hetrosexual!

    ReplyDelete