The NZ Herald has a piece detailing statistics relating to the breaching of protection orders. I read through it looking for mention of what appears to be common scenarios. That is the female applies for a protection order and then the couple surreptitiously reconcile. Or the female uses a protection order maliciously to prevent the father from seeing his children and he refuses to accept it.
People use the law when it suits and ignore it when it doesn't.
Typically though these circumstances are not acknowledged. The writer probably didn't ask anybody who might speak on behalf of male partners and fathers. The assumption is simply that men who break protection orders pose a further threat to the women. Doubtless this is sometimes the case. In fact women have been killed when protection orders are breached.
But how I long for some less superficial analysis of matters that relate to 'family violence'.
IBM: Smart Ideas for Smarter Cities
18 minutes ago